Pellet & Airsoft

 

Do you own a BB, pellet, or other airgun?  Are you a Paintball or Airsoft enthusiast?

Well, if you are, you are not alone!  You have been directly targeted in the Liberal gun control legislation Bill C-21.

The Liberal government’s proposed law would make you a criminal in possession of prohibited devices.  Don’t believe it?  Read the excerpt from this legislation as posted below.  You will be shocked.

The bill does much more than that – here is our summary of the key points of the legislation: Guide to C-21

There is nothing good in this bill.

The NFA welcomes you to the fight against civil disarmament and destruction of the Canadian firearms culture.  We are the largest and oldest firearms rights advocacy organization and gun lobby in Canada.

Here is what you need to do right now:

1.Tell your friends and family about what is going on.  Use the NFA summary sheet for reference.

2.Contact your member of parliament, your provincial MLA/MPP, and your local city councillor and mayor.  Tell them that you are opposed to federal Bill C-21 in its entirety. Bill C-21 will have an effect on all three of those levels of government.

a) Make an appointment to speak to these elected officials in person.

b) Call and write letters and emails to all levels of government to oppose this unjust bill.

3.Join and support Canada’s National Firearms Association at NFA.ca – We stand with you in this fight.

4.Work to ensure that the Liberal Party of Canada loses the next election.

5.Organize your friends and family and encourage them to do the same.

Liberal proposed changes to the Criminal Code affecting airguns from Bill C-21:

1 (1) The definition replica firearm in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code is replaced by the following:

replica firearm means any device that is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, a firearm that is designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second and at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules, and that itself is not a firearm, but does not include any such device that is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, an antique firearm;

(2) Section 84 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (3.1):

Certain firearms deemed to be prohibited devices

(3.2) For the purposes of sections 99 to 101, 103 to 107 and 117.03, a firearm is deemed to be a prohibited device if

(a) it is proved that the firearm is not designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second or at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules; and

(b) the firearm is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, a firearm, other than an antique firearm, that is designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second and at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules.

(The complete text of Bill C-21 may be read HERE:.)

If you thought that gun control didn’t affect you, you were mistaken.  Gun control has never been about public safety – it has always been about civil disarmament and destruction of culture.  Help us to help you, join the National Firearms Association today.

Canada’s National Firearms Association is this country’s largest and most effective advocacy organization representing the interests of firearms owners and users. Canada’s National Firearms Association is the largest Canadian organization fighting for the rights of Canadian firearms users.  NFA is a registered UN NGO with consultative status to ECOSOC.

For more information contact:
Blair Hagen, Executive VP Communications, 604-753-8682 Blair@nfa.ca
Sheldon Clare, President, 250-981-1841 Sheldon@nfa.ca
Canada’s NFA toll-free number – 1-877-818-0393
NFA Website: www.nfa.ca

Bill C-21 prohibits airguns

Speaking From Prince George, BC NFA President Sheldon Clare stated: “Bill C-21 is about ending your ability to collect, enjoy, and make use of your firearms.  If you doubt this, consider the government’s direct attack on items that were not even previously considered firearms. The Liberal government’s proposed law Bill C-21would make anyone who owns a BB, pellet, or other airgun, or participates in Paintball or Airsoft a criminal in possession of prohibited devices.  There is nothing good in Bill C-21”

Here is the NFA summary of the key points of the legislation: Guide to Bill C-21

Clare advised affected persons to:

1.Tell your friends and family about what is going on.  Use the NFA summary for reference.

2.Contact your member of parliament, your provincial MLA/MPP, and your local city councillor and mayor. Tell them that you are opposed to federal Bill C-21 in its entirety.  Bill C-21 will have an effect on all three of those levels of government.

a)Make an appointment to speak to these elected officials in person.

b)Call and write letters and emails to all levels of government to oppose this unjust bill.

3.Join and support Canada’s National Firearms Association at NFA.ca – We stand with you in this fight.

4.Work to ensure that the Liberal Party of Canada loses the next election.

5.Organize your friends and family and encourage them to do the same.

Liberal proposed changes to the Criminal Code affecting airguns from Bill C-21:

1 (1) The definition replica firearm in subsection 84(1) of the Criminal Code is replaced by the following:

replica firearm means any device that is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, a firearm that is designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second and at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules, and that itself is not a firearm, but does not include any such device that is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, an antique firearm;

(2) Section 84 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (3.1):

Certain firearms deemed to be prohibited devices

(3.2) For the purposes of sections 99 to 101, 103 to 107 and 117.03, a firearm is deemed to be a prohibited device if

(a) it is proved that the firearm is not designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second or at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules; and

(b) the firearm is designed or intended to exactly resemble, or to resemble with near precision, a firearm, other than an antique firearm, that is designed or adapted to discharge a shot, bullet or other projectile at a muzzle velocity exceeding 152.4 m per second and at a muzzle energy exceeding 5.7 Joules.

(The complete text of Bill C-21 may be read HERE.)

Clare concluded, “If you thought that gun control didn’t affect you, you were mistaken.  Gun control has never been about public safety – it has always been about civil disarmament and destruction of culture.  Help us to help you, join the National Firearms Association today.”

Canada’s National Firearms Association is this country’s largest and most effective advocacy organization representing the interests of firearms owners and users. Canada’s National Firearms Association is the largest Canadian organization fighting for the rights of Canadian firearms users.  NFA is a registered UN NGO with consultative status to ECOSOC.

-30-

For more information contact:
Blair Hagen, Executive VP Communications, 604-753-8682 Blair@nfa.ca
Sheldon Clare, President, 250-981-1841 Sheldon@nfa.ca
Canada’s NFA toll-free number – 1-877-818-0393
NFA Website: www.nfa.ca

THE NFA’S GUIDE TO BILL C-21

 

Bill C-21 was introduced in the House of Commons on February 16, 2021.  The Bill is essentially a series of amendments to existing laws, most importantly the Criminal code and the Firearms Act, and, to a much lesser extent, other federal legislation.

Here is an overview:

Harsher maximum sentences for certain firearms related offences:

The maximum sentence for the offences listed hereafter (when prosecuted by indictment) is increased from 10 years to 14 years:

  • Possession of prohibited or restricted firearm with ammunition in an unauthorized location (s. 95 CC)
  • Possession of weapon obtained by commission of offence (s. 96 CC)
  • Weapons trafficking (s. 99 CC)
  • Possession for purpose of weapons trafficking (s. 100 CC)
  • Importing or exporting knowing it is unauthorized (s. 103 CC)

Creation of new criminal offence: Alteration of magazine capacity

Possession of a magazine exceeding the prescribed maximum capacity was already illegal.  A person who modifies a magazine now commits two separate offences instead of one.

Some airguns become “prohibited devices” for transfer and other specific purposes

Air guns that are currently exempt from licensing and registration requirements, because they do not meet muzzle energy or velocity thresholds (e.g.CO2 powered pistols) will be reclassified as prohibited devices for transfer purposes, if they are identical to or closely resemble modern firearms that are subject to licensing. Current owners will apparently be allowed to keep them, but they will not be allowed to transfer them to third parties.  The loss (or finding) of such an air gun will have to be reported, failing which the owner becomes liable to criminal prosecution.

Emergency Prohibition Orders

The bill allows any person to make an ex parte (i.e., without prior notification to the person concerned) application to a provincial court judge to obtain a temporary firearms prohibition order, valid for 30 days.  In essence, this change allows a person with safety concerns to bypass the police and go straight to court.  Upon service of the order by a police officer, firearms will be seized, pending the outcome of a hearing for a longer-term prohibition order.  There is huge potential for malicious use of these provisions, especially in the context of domestic and other disputes.  This will also be an additional burden on an already backlogged court system.

Firearms that were prohibited pursuant to the May 1, 2020 Order in Council.

Although the Government says their so-called  “buy-back” is still in the plans, the bill does not address the so-called “buy-back”, or the indemnities to be paid.

The bill purports to repeal the provisions of the Firearms Act that provide for grandfathering with limited usage (i.e., paragraphs 12(8) and (9)).  Instead, it provides for “storage” only grandfathering.  In other words, existing owners will be given the option to keep their prohibited firearms, solely as collection items, and without possibility of use, sale, transfer, gift, or acquiring other firearms of the same class.  There will also be ongoing compliance requirements.

Other firearms that may in the future be re-classified as prohibited by way of regulations will be subject to the same rules.  This is the evergreen clause that the Liberals have been alluding to.

Authorizations to Carry Handguns for the protection of life

The authority to issue ATCs for the protection of life is being taken away from provincial Chief Firearms Officers and granted to the Commissioner of Firearms (the RCMP).  This is likely in response that certain provinces such as Alberta, who have recently appointed a gun owner friendly CFO, might be tempted to issue those ATCs.  At last count, there was only one such ATC issued in all of Canada, for the protection of life.
Chief Firearms Officers retain jurisdiction to issue ATCs in connection with professional purposes (e.g. trappers, security guards, prospectors)

Importing of Ammunition

A person (other than a non-resident) entering Canada with ammunition will be required to exhibit a valid firearms licence.

Municipal prohibitions on storage of handguns

The Bill recognizes that municipalities may enact by-laws that prohibit the storage of handguns.  However, it does not grant them the power to do so.  Municipalities are creatures of the provinces.  That power will necessarily come from the provincial legislation that they are subject to.

Should municipalities enact such by-laws and to the extent that those municipalities notify the Federal Public Safety Minister, licensed gun owners will be required to comply.  There will be a 180-day phase-in period.  After that, for affected gun owners, storage of handguns will only be allowed at authorized central storage facilities.  Transportation of handguns to and from a location within one of those municipalities will not be authorized.  Ranges located within a municipality that has enacted such a by-law will likely be forced to offer centralized storage services in order to remain in operation.

Collectors will be likely affected, as they will no longer be able to store their collection of handguns at their place of residence, should the municipality they live in pass such a by-law.

The apparent rationale for this new scheme is that the Government considers that handguns are at too high a risk to be stolen if they are stored at home.

Suspension of firearms licenses

Chief Firearms Officers will be granted the power to suspend firearms licenses.  A suspension can be for such period of time as the CFO determines.  While a license is suspended, usage and acquisition of firearms, ammunition is prohibited.  The targeted licensee will not be required to surrender or dispose of their firearms, unless the license is subsequently revoked.

The decision to suspend a license does not appear to be challengeable under s. 74 of the Firearms Act.

Surrender of firearms while license revocation/non-renewal is being challenged.

Individuals who opt to challenge a non-renewal/revocation of their firearms license under s. 74 of the Firearms Act will be forced to surrender all of their firearms to police while the challenge is pending.

Firearms Advertising

No firearms advertising may depict, counsel or promote violence against persons.  This prohibition might encompass any advertising promoting self-defence and, potentially, some tactical sports.

Enlarged powers to regulate handgun storage

The Government is granting itself new powers to enact storage regulations that are specific to handguns.  Based upon earlier statements and Minister mandate letters, it is expected that safes or vaults will become mandatory.  That power will also apply to the required specifications for central storage facilities.

 

Bill C-21 

Statement from Cassandra Parker

My name is Cassandra Parker.

I am a law-abiding firearms owner. I am a hunter. I am a target shooter. I am a small business owner. I am also a mother and a wife.

I am licensed to possess firearms. My firearms are registered, as required by law. I have always used them and stored them safely and legally.

But, on May 1, 2020, the Government of Canada prohibited many of my firearms, both those that I owned personally and those owned by my family-run business, K.K.S. Tactical Supplies Ltd. These firearms were prohibited not by an Act of Parliament, with the democratic assent of our elected representatives, but by Order-in-Council – a declaration by Cabinet, without the possibility of debate or dissent.

Those firearms have now been rendered worthless. My business cannot sell them. I cannot use them. Using or selling those firearms is now a criminal offence, punishable by years in the penitentiary – a lengthy prison sentence for doing something that was absolutely legal the day before the Order came into effect.

This is wrong. It is unfair. It cannot stand.

I was always taught that the only way to deter bullies is to stand up to them. As law-abiding firearms owners, we must stand up to the bullies in Ottawa who would make us criminals with the stroke of a pen.

To stand up to these bullies, I have retained Solomon Friedman of Friedman Mansour LLP in Ottawa. Solomon is one of the foremost experts on firearms law in Canada and I am pleased that he has taken on this challenge.

But we are not alone in this challenge. Canada’s National Firearms Association has generously agreed to support my challenge. They are also intervening on our challenge to provide the NFA’s expertise to the Court. I am ever grateful for their assistance. Simply put, this fight would not be possible without the NFA’s assistance.

We have filed our application. But the work is just beginning. Months of litigation lie ahead.

We are currently assembling evidence that will demonstrate that the government’s decision is illegal and contrary to the Criminal Code. We hope to have this Order-in-Council declared of no force and effect. That decision would benefit all affected firearms owners.

If you would like to support this challenge, please go to contribute. Please indicate “Parker v. Canada” on the donation form. Every little bit helps.

Thank you all!